Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Bahamas Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Bahamas
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Bahamas
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Bahamas Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,629,900 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 16.6% |
Range | 16.5% | 16.1% |
Mean | 5.5% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.2% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Scottish (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Welsh (6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |