Asian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,442,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.90%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 9.5% | 13.0% |
| Range | 7.7% | 12.1% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |