Yup'ik vs British Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
British
Disability
Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
British
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs British Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,961,482 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,410,774 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.38%.

Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | British |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 23.6% | 98.5% |
| Range | 18.1% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 21.7% |
| Median | 13.3% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and British by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Bahamian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Chinese (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Italian (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |