Subsaharan African vs British Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
British
Disability
Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
British
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs British Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,103,774 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,410,774 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | British |
| Minimum | 6.6% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 98.5% |
| Range | 38.9% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 21.7% |
| Median | 12.4% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and British by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are European (12.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |