Immigrants from Laos vs Samoan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
 Samoan
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Samoans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos vs Samoan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,465,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.14%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Laos | Samoan | 
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.5% | 
| Maximum | 13.9% | 18.6% | 
| Range | 12.5% | 17.1% | 
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.0% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos and Samoans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% | 
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% | 
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% | 
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% | 
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |