Immigrants from Lithuania vs Slavic Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Slavic
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Slavs
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Slavic Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,835,227 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 17.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Slavic |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 5.7% | 15.4% |
| Range | 3.5% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 5.0% |
| Median | 3.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Polish (3.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Hmong (3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |