Ute vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Ute
 Slavic
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Ute
Slavs
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,763,521 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 7.7%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Slavic | 
| Minimum | 23.7% | 40.0% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 76.3% | 60.0% | 
| Mean | 73.4% | 85.2% | 
| Median | 75.4% | 87.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 82.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.0% | 100.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.3% | 17.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 16.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 16.1% | 
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Austrian (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Jordan (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% | 
| Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% | 
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% | 
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |