Nonimmigrants vs Celtic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Celtic
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Celtics
2.5%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Celtic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 581,859,538 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.37% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 12.3% |
| Range | 12.5% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 3.6% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.38% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Celtics by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are French American Indian (2.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Honduran (2.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Sioux (2.5%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Central America (2.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and Yakama (2.5%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.5% |