Bahamian vs Celtic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bahamian
Celtic
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bahamians
Celtics
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Celtic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,669,490 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bahamian | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.51% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 5.5% | 12.3% |
Range | 5.0% | 11.9% |
Mean | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.69% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.83% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians and Celtics by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Chippewa (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cape Verdean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.5% |