Syrian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability
COMPARE
Syrian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Syrians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,312,876 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,716,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.23%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 40.4% | 25.5% |
| Range | 39.1% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 12.2% |
| Median | 12.7% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Sudanese (12.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Icelander (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Danish (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (12.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |