Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,804,285 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,716,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 4.2% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 18.9% | 25.5% |
Range | 14.7% | 22.6% |
Mean | 11.1% | 12.2% |
Median | 11.2% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Hungary (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Sudan (11.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Danish (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sudanese (12.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |