Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Western Asia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Western Asia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Western Asia
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Western Asia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,322,265 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.42%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Western Asia |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 6.1% | 26.5% |
| Range | 5.1% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.7% |
| Median | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.72% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Western Asia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |