Soviet Union vs Kenyan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
 Kenyan
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Kenyans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Kenyan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,202,963 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Kenyan | 
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% | 
| Maximum | 6.1% | 7.0% | 
| Range | 5.1% | 5.6% | 
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.2% | 
| Median | 3.0% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 1.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 1.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Kenyans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 2.9%  |