Serbian vs Immigrants from Chile Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Serbian
Immigrants from Chile
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Serbians
Immigrants from Chile
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
93.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Immigrants from Chile Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,466,690 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,576,088 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.87%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 13.4% | 14.3% |
| Range | 13.2% | 13.5% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 0.58% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Immigrants from Chile by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from Africa (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovene (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Greek (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Slovenes | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 93.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Serbians | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Scandinavians | 93.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| South Americans | 93.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.4% |