Scandinavian vs Icelander Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Scandinavian
 Icelander
 Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Scandinavians
Icelanders
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Icelander Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,531,720 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,567,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
 
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Icelander | 
| Minimum | 0.56% | 0.38% | 
| Maximum | 26.9% | 15.0% | 
| Range | 26.3% | 14.6% | 
| Mean | 5.2% | 2.9% | 
| Median | 3.3% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 3.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Icelanders by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Serbian (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Africa (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Greek (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovene (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability | 
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| British | 94.3 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Slovenes | 94.1 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 93.7 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Serbians | 93.6 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 2.4%  | 
| Scandinavians | 93.5 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 2.4%  |