Carpatho Rusyn vs Icelander Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Icelander
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Icelanders
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Icelander Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,870,733 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,567,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Icelander |
Minimum | 0.22% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 7.8% | 15.0% |
Range | 7.6% | 14.6% |
Mean | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Icelanders by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Indonesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Bhutanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Alsatian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Jordan (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.4% |