Immigrants from Israel vs Icelander Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Icelander
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Icelanders
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Icelander Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,935,200 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,567,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.52%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Icelander |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 15.0% |
| Range | 12.6% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.83% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Icelanders by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), European (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Jordan (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |