Immigrants from Oceania vs Syrian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Syrian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Syrians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Syrian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,278,347 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.93%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Syrian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 20.2% | 15.6% |
| Range | 18.6% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 6.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Syrians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Croatia (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |