Czech vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Costa Rica
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.73%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 32.8% | 14.6% |
| Range | 31.6% | 13.0% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 5.7% |
| Median | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |