Potawatomi vs Creek Disability
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Creek
Disability
Disability Comparison
Potawatomi
Creek
14.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Creek Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,767,457 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,460,797 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 10.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Creek |
| Minimum | 9.9% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 35.3% |
| Range | 23.2% | 26.7% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 20.8% |
| Median | 18.5% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Creek by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Osage (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Navajo (14.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |