Pima vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Pima
Cherokee
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Pima
Cherokee
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,106,985 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 50.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 9.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.0% |
| Range | 89.3% | 65.7% |
| Mean | 38.9% | 27.7% |
| Median | 35.3% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.5% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.4% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.6% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Chickasaw (19.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Vietnamese (19.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |