Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Japan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Japan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Japan
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Japan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,170,588 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,950,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 2.6%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Japan |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.20% |
| Maximum | 3.5% | 10.6% |
| Range | 3.3% | 10.4% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Median | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.62% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.65% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.64% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Japan by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Indonesia (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |