Liberian vs Finnish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Liberian
Finnish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Liberians
Finns
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
7.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Finnish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,077,126 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,562,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Liberian | Finnish |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 16.8% | 27.6% |
| Range | 14.6% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 8.0% |
| Median | 6.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Finns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Honduras (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.17%), German Russian (6.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Albania (6.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Hungarian (6.3%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |