Immigrants from Latin America vs Finnish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Finnish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Finns
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Finnish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,562,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.68%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Finnish |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 27.6% |
Range | 11.1% | 27.1% |
Mean | 6.2% | 8.0% |
Median | 6.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.86% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Finns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |