Ugandan vs Immigrants from South America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from South America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from South America
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from South America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,161,675 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from South America |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 14.2% | 18.8% |
Range | 12.8% | 18.1% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.6% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from South America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |