Soviet Union vs Immigrants from South America Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from South America
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from South America
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from South America Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,161,675 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.90%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from South America |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 18.8% |
| Range | 8.2% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from South America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |