Bhutanese vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Ugandan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Ugandans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.50%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 14.2% |
| Range | 13.8% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 5.7% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Ugandans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |