Immigrants vs Immigrants from Europe Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Europe
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Europe
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Europe Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,017,856 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.11%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Europe |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 88.9% |
| Range | 18.8% | 88.1% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 12.3% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 17.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Europe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |