Immigrants vs Immigrants from Italy Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Italy
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Italy
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Italy Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,167,823 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.22%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Italy |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 14.0% |
Range | 18.8% | 13.4% |
Mean | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Italy by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |