Immigrants vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Poland
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Poland
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 17.5% |
| Range | 18.8% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Poland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |