Immigrants vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
 Immigrants from Brazil
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Brazil
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,876,891 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Brazil | 
| Minimum | 0.87% | 0.070% | 
| Maximum | 13.1% | 9.7% | 
| Range | 12.2% | 9.7% | 
| Mean | 2.9% | 3.1% | 
| Median | 2.6% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.95% | 0.99% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.9%  |