Immigrants vs Immigrants from Poland Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Poland
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Poland
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Poland Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,876,891 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 13.1% | 20.5% |
| Range | 12.2% | 19.6% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 4.7% |
| Median | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.95% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |