Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Brazil
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Brazil
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.10%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Brazil |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.070% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 9.7% |
| Range | 28.7% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |