Sudanese vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
 Immigrants from Brazil
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Brazil
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Brazil | 
| Minimum | 0.77% | 0.070% | 
| Maximum | 6.7% | 9.7% | 
| Range | 5.9% | 9.7% | 
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.1% | 
| Median | 3.0% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 0.99% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.97% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.96% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153  | Good 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154  | Good 2.9%  |