Immigrants vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
 Bhutanese
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Bhutanese
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,876,891 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,292,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 13.0%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Bhutanese | 
| Minimum | 0.87% | 1.7% | 
| Maximum | 13.1% | 10.5% | 
| Range | 12.2% | 8.8% | 
| Mean | 2.9% | 4.0% | 
| Median | 2.6% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.95% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |