Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Sri Lankan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Sri Lankan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Sri Lankans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Sri Lankan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,158,739 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.97%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 15.7% |
| Range | 6.2% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 0.48% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Sri Lankans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Albanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Italy (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Carpatho Rusyn (2.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Swedish (2.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |