Carpatho Rusyn vs Ugandan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
 Ugandan
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Ugandans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ugandan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,850,680 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,002,961 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.56%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Ugandan | 
| Minimum | 0.42% | 0.51% | 
| Maximum | 7.5% | 7.2% | 
| Range | 7.1% | 6.7% | 
| Mean | 2.5% | 2.1% | 
| Median | 2.0% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Ugandans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Italy (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 2.1%  |