Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Slovak Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Slovak
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Slovaks
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
18.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Slovak Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,414,578 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 6.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Slovak |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.29% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 12.9% |
| Range | 6.2% | 12.6% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |