Czech vs Ugandan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Ugandan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Czechs
Ugandans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Ugandan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,953,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,002,961 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.36% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 7.2% |
| Range | 9.8% | 6.7% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Ugandans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Vietnamese (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%), New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |