Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Norwegian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Norwegian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Norwegians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Norwegian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,788,572 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,593,682 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 12.0% | 14.8% |
| Range | 11.7% | 14.2% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.60% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Norwegians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Burmese (2.3%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Pakistan (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |