Turkish vs Norwegian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Norwegian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Turks
Norwegians
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Norwegian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,627,212 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,593,682 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 14.8% |
| Range | 4.0% | 14.2% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 0.60% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Norwegians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Iranian (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |