Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Turkish
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Turks
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Turkish Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,788,572 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,627,212 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.33%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 12.0% | 4.5% |
| Range | 11.7% | 4.0% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.61% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 0.81% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Turks by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Cambodian (2.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |