Immigrants from Romania vs Russian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Russian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Russians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Russian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Russian |
| Minimum | 0.77% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 75.4% |
| Range | 15.5% | 74.4% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 9.5% |
| Median | 6.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Russians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |