Immigrants from Romania vs Latvian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Latvian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Latvians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Latvian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,706,558 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.77% | 0.23% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 28.4% |
| Range | 15.5% | 28.1% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.3% |
| Median | 6.0% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Latvians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |