Immigrants from Romania vs Danish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Danish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Danes
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Danish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.57%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Danish |
| Minimum | 0.77% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 51.6% |
| Range | 15.5% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.5% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |