Immigrants from Serbia vs Russian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Russian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Russians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Russian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,742,099 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Russian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 75.4% |
| Range | 12.5% | 74.4% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 9.5% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Russians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.32%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |