Immigrants from Romania vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,951,359 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.6%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Romania	Norwegian
Minimum	0.77%	1.3%
Maximum	16.3%	18.9%
Range	15.5%	17.7%
Mean	6.9%	6.8%
Median	6.0%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.3%	5.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.6%	7.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	1.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.1%	2.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.1%	2.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Norwegians by Ambulatory Disability

In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Ambulatory Disability
Immigrants \| South America	97.9 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Kenya	97.8 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Romania	97.7 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.8%
New Zealanders	97.6 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	97.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	97.3 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.8%
Uruguayans	97.2 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.8%
Colombians	97.2 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	97.1 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Colombia	96.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.8%
Danes	96.6 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.8%
South Africans	96.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Poland	95.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.9%
South American Indians	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Africa	94.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	93.6 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.9%
Russians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 5.9%
Norwegians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 5.9%
Estonians	92.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 5.9%
Costa Ricans	92.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 5.9%