Immigrants from Poland vs Ugandan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Ugandan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Ugandans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Ugandan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.45% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 9.4% |
| Range | 19.6% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 3.5% |
| Median | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |