Immigrants from Norway vs Russian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Russian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Russians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Russian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,868,935 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.080%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Russian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 18.2% |
Range | 19.1% | 17.5% |
Mean | 6.0% | 5.2% |
Median | 4.2% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Russians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |