Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ethiopian Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
 Ethiopian
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Ethiopians
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ethiopian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,724,932 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,240,308 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Ethiopian | 
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.1% | 
| Maximum | 17.7% | 15.9% | 
| Range | 15.5% | 13.9% | 
| Mean | 10.9% | 10.0% | 
| Median | 10.6% | 10.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from El Salvador (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Spain (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), South American (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Peruvian (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Turkish (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Cambodian (10.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Mongolian (10.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Australia (10.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Vietnamese | 99.9 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 10.9%  |